Cases 41 - 50 of 132
Young v. Lynch et al
as 3:2016cv02818
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, US Dept of Justice and Ben Brieschke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pledger v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016ct03253
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo M. Pledger
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles Samuels, Jr., J.F. Caraway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ALAMOUDI v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv01877
Plaintiff:
ABDURAHAM MUHAMMAD ALAMOUDI
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH, THOMAS R. KANE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Cruz v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv11858
Plaintiff:
Luis De La Cruz
Defendant:
United States of America , Loretta Lynch , Jeffrey Grondolsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Lynch et al
as 3:2016cv00935
Plaintiff:
Robert R Banks
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Gerardo S Gutierrez, Paul G Christenson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kendall v. Obama et al
as 1:2016cv06410
Plaintiff:
Cyril Kendall
Defendant:
Barrack Husain Obama, Loretta Lynch, Maureen Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. The United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv06187
Plaintiff:
Ulysses T Ware
Defendant:
The United States Bureau of Prisons, Loretta Lynch, The Department of Justice and Its Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seavon Pierce v. United States Congress et al
as 2:2016cv05933
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigations, Federal Judicial Commission, Federal Judicial Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Seavon Pierce v. President Barack Obama et al
as 2:2016cv05387
Defendant:
Barbara A. Boxer, Civil Fraud, Investigations Div, Civil-Criminal Enforcement Division and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Lewis v. US Justice Department et al
as 2:2016cv01112
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Defendant:
US Justice Department and Loretta Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
