Cases 41 - 50 of 986
Erwin v. Ramos
as 6:2023cv01821
Plaintiff:
James Erwin
Defendant:
Steven Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2023cv16879
Plaintiff:
RAMOS M. CRUZ
Defendant:
WARDEN, OFFICER PETTY, OFFICER J.C. DARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. HAMLETT et al
as 2:2023cv15723
Plaintiff:
SAHDIEKHAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
CELESTE HAMLETT, MONICA TYSON, SHALAA CURETON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolterstorff v. Quiros et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Robert Munro Wolterstorff III and Robert Munro Wolterstorff, III
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Guadarrama, McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hairston v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv01186
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Defendant:
P. Davis, A. Mendoza, L. Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Doe
as 1:2023cv02091
Plaintiff:
Abraham Garcia Ramos
Defendant:
Dr. John/Jane Doe and Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin v. Ramos
as 6:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
James Erwin
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriff Department and OCSO Steven Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beckwith v. Mason et al
as 3:2023cv01111
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Rae Beckwith
Defendant:
Dep. Mason, Dep. D. Jung, Dep. Babock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacob Lee Haughton v. Ramos et al
as 2:2023cv06216
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lee Haughton
Defendant:
Lt. H. Ramos, Sgt. Tillotson, Sgt. A. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05659
Plaintiff:
Shanell K Duncan
Defendant:
Pierce County, Alvin R Allen, Maria Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
