Cases 51 - 60 of 6,471
Flanders v. Tipton et al
as 5:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Lavont Flanders, Jr
Defendant:
C. Tipton, E.K. Carlton and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Sheng-Wen Cheng v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1645
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Clifford C. Loyer v. The United States of America
as 8:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chaun Loyer
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YARULLINA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01022
Plaintiff:
ILMIYA YARULLINA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE, DIRECTOR JAMES M. MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Janczuk v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv02738
Plaintiff:
Weronika E. Janczuk
Defendant:
United States of America and Institution/Financial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. USA, et al
as 24-5077
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Gorbey and Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant:
United States of America, (i.e. Federal Judges), Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Administration FBOP Grand Prairie Texas Designation Center and others
Valoy v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Orlando V. Valoy
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Maweu v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Brian Musomba Maweu
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WILSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv04645
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MARK WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN, DR. FARRAH AHMEDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
