Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Beggs v. Burean County et al
as 4:2016cv04102
Plaintiff:
Brian Beggs
Defendant:
Sheriff Burean County , Bureau County , Dr. Karen Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinderliter v. Stewart Co. Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2016cv00882
Plaintiff:
Rodney Hinderliter, Jr.
Defendant:
Lisa Hatcher, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and Jason Ballenger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Warkins et al
as 8:2016cv00208
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Julie Warkins and Dan Williams
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Piercy v. Wilhelmi et al
as 2:2016mc00015
Plaintiff:
Aaron Piercy
Defendant:
Kelly Wilhelmi, Dan Williams , Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Brazelton v. Tippecanoe County Sheriff et al
as 4:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Lamonte Brazelton
Defendant:
Tippecanoe County Sheriff , Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. , Nurse J Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadfield v. Livingston County et al
as 1:2016cv01092
Plaintiff:
Brian D Broadfield
Defendant:
Livingston County, Livingston County Sheriff, Tony Childress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brey v. Osborne et al
as 4:2015cv00135
Plaintiff:
Todd Nathaniel Brey
Defendant:
David Osborne, Marty Teasley, Sherry Hurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbrough v. Boyd et al
as 4:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
John Allen Yarbrough
Defendant:
Brad Boyd, Joe Blue and Advance Correction HealthCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fee v. Buchanan County et al
as 5:2015cv06130
Plaintiff:
Tyler Fee
Defendant:
Missouri Buchanan County , Harry Roberts , Dan Hausman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hodges v. Parnell et al
as 5:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Ralph Hodges, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Parnell, Daniel Thomas and Advance Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
