Cases 61 - 70 of 96
Demos v. US Secretary of Defense, The et al
as 2:2013cv00001
Plaintiff:
John R Demos
Defendant:
US Secretary of Defense, The, CIA Director, Barack H Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
FERRER v. M.C.C.I. et al
as 3:2012cv07768
Plaintiff:
JULIO FERRER
Defendant:
M.C.C.I., US ATTORNEY GENERALS OFFICE and US MARSHALLS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Wattleton v. US Attorney General
as 12-15019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL
David Wattleton v. US Attorney General
as 12-14922
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID EARL WATTLETON
Defendant - Appellee:
US ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hart v. US Attorney General
as 1:2012fp00362
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hannibal Hart
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - CV (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
US Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gereb v. US Attorney General et al
as 6:2012cv03401
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Gereb
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Harley Lappin, G Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Parrack v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-5249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy J. Parrack
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Attorney General
Tilman Partin v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-5214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tilman Rufus Partin
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., US Attorney General of Washington DC
Soboroff v. US Federal Government et al
as 4:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Alan Soboroff
Defendant:
US Federal Government, US Attorney General, US Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Orman, et al
as 12-6066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID ORMAN, Mailroom Supervisor, MIKE OAKLEY, General Counsel, CRAIG MARSHAL, Assistant AG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
