Cases 81 - 90 of 2,142
Powell v. Broome et al
as 3:2023cv01395
Plaintiff:
Kim Powell
Defendant:
Sharon Weston Broome, Murphy J. Paul, Jr., Brandon Boudreaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Robinson et al
as 1:2023cv01189
Plaintiff:
Ryan Albert Murphy
Defendant:
Jared Robinson, Mark Stevens, Dr. FNU Gallagow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Lt. KM Fleming, Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv01170
Defendant:
Jedidiah Murphy, Mr. Alexander Jones and Mr. Ali Nasser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALFORD v. PLUMERI et al
as 1:2023cv20440
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EARL ALFORD
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, PENNSAUKEN TOWNSHIP, KEVIN KEYS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gomez v. City of Canton Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv01788
Plaintiff:
Omar R. Gomez
Defendant:
City of Canton Police Department, Detective Michael Walker, Ohio Adult Parole Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gottorff (PS) v. Murphy et al
as 1:2023cv02301
Plaintiff:
David J. Gottorff
Defendant:
Sean Murphy and Kurt Beckenhauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Medina (PS) v. Murphy et al
as 1:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Delano Medina
Defendant:
Jennifer Murphy and Colorado Parole Board, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Berry v. USA, et al
as 23-12750
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY BERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALLISON MURPHY, RICHARD LI and others
Murphy v. Warden, Mark W. Stiles Unit
as 1:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Otheaner Deon Murphy
Defendant:
Warden, Mark W. Stiles Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
