Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Robinson v. United States of America et al.
as 3:2021cv00193
Plaintiff:
Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
United States of America, S. Harjl, G.A. Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Robinson v. United States of America et al.
as 3:2021cv00128
Defendant:
Warden S. Harjl, Anthony Robinson, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lathan et al v. Rutter et al
as 3:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
Darek Lathan, Kelley Lee, Richard Stewart and others
Defendant:
John Tharp, Alex Rutter, Dennis Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Robinson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
as 1:2019cv02035
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 0:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 5:2019cv00075
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv02774
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bowens
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Shirley Colvin, Clifford Martin, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Robinson v. John Wetzel, et al
as 15-3410
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK ANTHONY ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary, DOC and DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Officer
Robinson v. Southers et al
as 3:2013cv01603
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Robinson
Defendant:
Richard Southers, John Wetzel, Shirley Moore-Smeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson et al v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2011cv02194
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Robinson, Joshua Payne, Maurice Edwards and others
Defendant:
John Wetzel and Jeffy Ditty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
