Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Chism v. Long et al
as 8:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Chism
Defendant:
Janet C. Long, Brian Scott, Charles Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gottorff (PS) v. Chism
as 1:2023cv02374
Plaintiff:
David J Gottorff
Defendant:
Bernie Chism
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gottorff (PS) v. Michelich
as 1:2023cv02384
Plaintiff:
David J Gottorff
Defendant:
Andres Michelich, Brian Hoefling, Shane Schmalz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chism
as 5:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Defendant:
Mrs. Peggy Chism
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREENE v. HARRISON et al
as 7:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDREW TYRELL GREENE and Asad Zay Bey
Defendant:
ADA MICHELLE T HARRISON, DA BRADFIELD SHEALY, SHERRIFF ASHLEY PAULK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Miami Correctional Facility
as 3:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Tayuan A Chism, Sr
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Oakes et al
as 3:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Melvin Chism, III
Defendant:
Ricky Oakes, Jeff Coffey, Shelly Mannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnathan Harper v. David Robinson, et al
as 22-16450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN SETH HARPER
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, DAVID PUTNAM, CRYSTAL THOMAS and others
Carrasco-Olivas v. Bellinger et al
as 5:2022cv03140
Plaintiff:
Horacio Carrasco-Olivas
Defendant:
Brian Bellinger, (fnu) Chism and Grant Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Moya v. Chism et al
as 1:2021cv01624
Plaintiff:
Rene Anthony Moya
Defendant:
B. Chism, M. Putnam, M. VanNess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
