Cases 1 - 10 of 11
GUEST v. POMERANTZ et al
as 2:2023cv21358
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAYMOND GUEST
Defendant:
M.D. JEFFREY POMERANTZ, JOHN/JANE DOE'S, JEFFREY POMERANTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wable v. North Central Regional Jail (Jane Doe) et al
as 5:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond Wable
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail (Jane Doe), Jane Doe, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wable
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond Wable
Defendant:
NCRJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNichols v. Pharmacutical Company for Correct Care Solution
as 0:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
Pharmacutical Company for Correct Care Solution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNichols v. Sexton et al
as 3:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McNichols
Defendant:
J. Sexton, Tyra Hughes, Sommea James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacey et al v. Baker
as 5:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
Carl Borg, Charles Raymond, Dennis Emerson and others
Defendant:
James Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Raymond v. McCool et al
as 2:2020cv00025
Defendant:
Harrison Co Jail, Tom McCool and Officer Brown
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClendon v. Freeport Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv02462
Defendant:
Freeport Police Department, Nassau Correctional Center and Nassau University Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McClendon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Kirkwood et al
as 2:2013cv14404
Plaintiff:
Steven Boyce Clark
Defendant:
Erin Kirkwood, Leo Ferriera, Joseph Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClendon v. Sposato
as 2:2012cv00452
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond McClendon
Defendant:
Michael Sposato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
