Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Garcia v. Randall County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant:
Randall County Jail, Christopher Forbis, Randall Co Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robledo v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice
as 6:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Robledo
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Calderon v. CDCR
as 2:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Calderon
Defendant:
CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. Anglea et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Lemons
Defendant:
C. Anglea, Mr. Brooks and FCI Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garcia v. Forbis et al
as 2:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant:
Christopher Forbis, Randall County Jail Medical Department, NFN Lacey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Calderon v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Calderon
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. Martinez and G. Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Ruiz
Defendant:
Dean Williams, Roetker, Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Watson
as 22-10863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Q. Watson, Off-site Contracted Professional
Conley v. Dr. Bhat et al
as 3:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Conley
Defendant:
Dr. Bhat, Brandy Moon and PA Clemens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conley v. Culpeper Sheriffs Office
as 7:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Conley
Defendant:
Culpeper Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
