Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Perez v. Osborn et al
as 9:2024cv00491
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Perez
Defendant:
Michael Osborn, Lee Harrigan, Matthew Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 3:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Gregory D Jones
Defendant:
. Hooker, 4th Dist Appt Ct Clerk (J Doe) or rep and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hooker et al
as 1:2024cv03862
Plaintiff:
Gregoy D Jones
Defendant:
Judge Hooker, 4th Distr Cppt-Cpt- Clerk (J Doe) or rep. and Cynthia A Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos et al v. Parmitel et al
as 9:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Francisco Santos, Windsor Coleman, Miguel Melendez and others
Defendant:
Cheryl Parmitel, Chaz Andrews, W. N. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOKER v. UNNAMED DEFENDANT'S
as 1:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL HOOKER
Defendant:
UNNAMED DEFENDANT'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOKER v. MCCORMICK
as 4:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
KENNETH HOOKER
Defendant:
J M MCCORMICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winters v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2022cv01490
Plaintiff:
Ashley Winters
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Phoenix Police Department, Unknown Karnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marine v. Bird et al
as 7:2022cv00293
Petitioner:
James Porter Marine
Defendant:
Jackie Bird, Michelle Lawson and Jennifer Hooker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooker v. NaphCare Medical et al
as 2:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Chris L. Hooker
Defendant:
NaphCare Medical, CCDC, Janny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. BLACKWOOD et al
as 1:2021cv00383
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY ADELE KING
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, CHARLES S. BLACKWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
