Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wilson v. Dabadie
as 23-30224
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cornelius Lorenzo Wilson
Defendant / Appellee:
Carl Dabadie, Jr., Baton Rouge Police Chief, Harold Williams, Officer, Jeffrey Pittman, Officer and others
Williams v. Lange et al
as 6:2021cv00650
Defendant:
Eddy Lange and Henry Garza
Plaintiff:
Edward Harold Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lepak et al
as 6:2021cv00335
Defendant:
Judge Paul Lepak and DA Henry Garza
Plaintiff:
Edward Harold Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mallow et al
as 6:2021cv00274
Defendant:
JANE DOE, Michael Sousounis, Rodney Wilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Harold Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Allen v. Chief Judges et al
as 6:2020cv00801
Defendant:
SCOTUS, Federal Courts, Chief Judges and others
Plaintiff:
Harold William Van Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Dabadie, Jr. et al
as 3:2017cv00578
Defendant:
Ferring Barton, City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge, Dana Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Lorenzo Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Williams et al
as 3:2014cv00582
Defendant:
Charles Karras, Richard McCloskey, Christopher McClure and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Arnzen, III, et al v. Charles Palmer, et al
as 12-3634
Plaintiff - Appellee:
John W. Arnzen, III, Harold Williams, Galen K. Shaffer and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Director Charles Palmer, Jason Smith and Brad Wittrock
James Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 12-6541
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HAROLD WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, ANNIE SELLERS, CECILIA R. REYNOLDS and others
Arnzen v. Palmer et al---NO FURTHER PLEADINGS BY PRO SE PARTIES PURSUANT TO #5 and #22 IRO
as 5:2012cv04001
Plaintiff:
John W Arnzen, III , Harold Williams and Galen K Shaffer
Defendant:
Charles Palmer , Jason Smith and Brad Wittrock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
