Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Mickles et al v. Def Jam et al
as 1:2023cv00988
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles, Serita Victoria House, Nigia Parer and others
Defendant:
Def Jam and Ghia-Bishop-Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Garrett et al
as 3:2022cv01934
Petitioner:
Michael Odom
Defendant:
FNU Garrett, FNU Caulkins, FNU Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Garrett et al
as 6:2022cv00343
Plaintiff:
Michael Odom
Defendant:
Sheriff FNU Garrett, Jail Administrator FNU Caulkins, Mrs. FNU Lloyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickles v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
United States of America, Bush Administration, Obama Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stork v. Havens et al
as 2:2021cv00176
Defendant:
Scott Shaginaw, Jam Medwetz and Jared Havens
Plaintiff:
Frank Edward Stork
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stork v. Havens et al
as 1:2021cv00205
Defendant:
Scott Shaginaw, Jam Medwetz and Jared Havens
Plaintiff:
Frank Edward Stork
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Stewart et al
as 1:2016cv02375
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., Blackout Entertainment and DoeBoy Entertainment
Defendant:
Sakir Stewart, Island Def Jam South, Island Def-Jam Universal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Arnolds
as 2:2014cv02589
Plaintiff:
Jam'Bri Sean Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Eric Arnolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Epic Records Group Entertainment et al
as 9:2013cv01062
Plaintiff:
Elijah M. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Epic Records Group Entertainment, James Cruz, Louis Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Westbrook v. Cate et al
as 1:2010cv01089
Plaintiff:
Bertrum Jam Westbrook
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, James A. Yates and Felix Igbinosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
