Cases 1 - 10 of 359
Buhl v. Artz et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
James Edward Buhl, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Artz, FNU Matthews, FNU Mackensey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Chief Roy Finner et al
as 4:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
James Edward Hicks
Defendant:
Chief Roy Finner, J. Torres and K9 Dog and Handler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03524
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banshu v. Haggler et al
as 1:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Kahusia J. Banshu
Defendant:
Sholomo S. Haggler, James Edward D'Auguste, Denis Michael Reo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant, James v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
James Edward Grant
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin and Milwaukee County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
James Edward Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America, Correctional Officer M. Slaughter and Medical R.N. W. Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Probst v. Beckett
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
James Edward Probst
Defendant:
A Beckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Nevada Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
