Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Henderson v. Discovery Card Corporate Office et al
as 4:2023cv01132
Plaintiff:
Lane Henderson
Defendant:
Discovery Card Corporate Office, Roger C. Hochschild, John T. Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Green et al
as 4:2022cv03615
Plaintiff:
Janell Elizabeth Hampton
Defendant:
John L. Green, Judge Barbara Stadler, Judge Josh Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Kahn et al
as 3:2017cv01956
Plaintiff:
Jayvell-Jones Washington
Defendant:
Maria Araujo Kahn, Robert Quintanilla, Jr., Ivan Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREENE v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2017cv05291
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. GREENE
Defendant:
GARY LANIGAN, ELIZABETH CONNOLLY, SHERRY YATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Lawful Remedies et al
as 4:2017cv02050
Plaintiff:
John Gregory Green
Defendant:
Lawful Remedies and Robert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkinson v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 9:2012cv80756
Plaintiff:
Reginald Wilkinson
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., V Greer, N McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00699
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Chris Davis, Teddy Hooper, Will Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Davis et al
as 2:2010cv02156
Plaintiff:
David W Howell
Defendant:
Chris Davis, Teddy Hooper, Will Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Goldy et al
as 2:2010cv00162
Plaintiff:
John K. Green
Defendant:
Goldy and C.D.C.R. Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Darryl Sanders v. Tamara Woolfolk, et al
as 09-3184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darryl Sanders
Defendant - Appellee:
Tamara Woolfolk, Ramiro Martinez, Jr., #6517, Police Officer, Nick W. Humphrey, #3691, Police Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
