Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Whatley v. Chicago police auto pound; city of, department of police 3510 south michigan ave, chicago, Ill 60653 et al
as 1:2021cv00134
Defendant:
Turnok, John Burke, Hazel crest police department ill,l 60429, Auto pound location and others
Plaintiff:
Lamar Whatley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sargent v. Larson et al
as 1:2017cv00511
Plaintiff:
Scott Sargent
Defendant:
James Larson, Mark Rockovich, Ronaldo Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coover v. Burke et al
as 3:2015cv01543
Plaintiff:
Robert Coover
Defendant:
John Burke, Texeira, Andrea McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
[ANGE] v. BURKE et al
as 2:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MICHAEL [ANGE]
Defendant:
JOHN BURKE, MICHAEL FREEMAN, YORK COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Carr v. Raymond Booker, et al
as 14-1258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND LEON CARR
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND BOOKER, Warden, DARRELL STEWARD, Deputy Warden, CORNELL HOWARD and others
Baxter v. Burke et al
as 3:2012cv01763
Plaintiff:
Curtis Baxter
Defendant:
John Burke and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Booker et al
as 2:2012cv15074
Plaintiff:
Raymond Carr
Defendant:
Darrell Steward , Cornell Howard, Annae Sanders and others
Anthony Mack v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 12-17347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY EDWARD MACK
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of California, KAMALA HARRIS, State Attorney General, STEVEN C. WOLAN, Public Defender and others
Mack v. Brown et al
as 4:2012cv02517
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Kamala Harris, Steven C. Wolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVARRIAGA v. FODOR et al
as 3:2010cv05370
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRA CHAVARRIAGA
Defendant:
JOHN FODOR, JOHN BURKE, MICHAEL SCHUTTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
