Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Mark v. New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Justin John Mark
Defendant:
New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van den Heuvel v. El Dorado County Judicials et al
as 2:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
John Mark Van den Heuvel
Defendant:
El Dorado County Judicials, Brandon Sharp, Kyle Aaron Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van den Heuvel v. Clark
as 2:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
John Mark Van den Heuvel
Defendant:
Adam Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van den Heuvel v. Strancener et al
as 2:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
John Mark Van den Heuvel
Defendant:
Warren C. Strancener, Kenneth J. Melikian, Greg Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whatley et al v. Stephens et al
as 1:2021cv00549
Plaintiff:
John Mark Whatley, Travis Carpenter and Derrick W. Holloway
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Minter, FNU Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2021cv00015
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
John Mark Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Whatley v. Stephens et al
as 1:2018cv00609
Defendant:
FNU Kelly, Zena Stephens, FNU Malvo and others
Plaintiff:
John Mark Whatley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRIBBS v. FORADORA et al
as 2:2018cv00861
Plaintiff:
KYLE DAVEY CRIBBS
Defendant:
JOHN MARK INGROSS, CHAD WEAVER, KRIS KITKO CARLINI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Whatley v. Stephens et al
as 1:2017cv00176
Plaintiff:
John Mark Whatley
Defendant:
Zena Stephens, FNU Kelly, FNU Malvo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. South Carolina, The State of et al
as 0:2015cv00848
Plaintiff:
Antonio Davis
Defendant:
South Carolina, The State of, John Mark Shiflet, Kristin Danielle Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
