Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Erby v. State of Tenn. et al
as 2:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
State of Tenn., Shelby County, Lee Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dove v. Friday et al
as 1:2021cv02372
Plaintiff:
Corey Lee Dove
Defendant:
Cleveland Friday, C.O. Elijah Garnett and Lt. Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CARRINGTON, JR. v. GATLING et al
as 1:2021cv00545
Plaintiff:
THEODORE MACON CARRINGTON, JR.
Defendant:
LT. LEE GATLING and PINEHURST N.C. POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERT MARTIN, as Conservator for DARLENE MARTIN, a Protected Person v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv11845
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, LT. MICHAEL NELSON, SGT. EARL FISHER and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARTIN, as Conservator for DARLENE MARTIN, a Protected Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Mall et al
as 3:2017cv00574
Plaintiff:
Ted Knox
Defendant:
Nurse Mall, Nurse Laing , Nurse Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norris v. Stancliff et al
as 1:2017cv00589
Defendant:
C. Bolles, S. Brown, E. Bucher and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Figgs-El et al v. Williams et al
as 5:2017ct03079
Plaintiff:
Lemarshall Figgs-El, Christian Douglas-El, Anthony Reels-El and others
Defendant:
Lt. Williams, Lt. Lee, Sgt. Cotton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpkins v. Sgt Donald et al
as 3:2014cv01470
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins
Defendant:
Sgt Donald, Jared S Cranford, Sgt. Canaidian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Folsom v. Knutson et al
as 5:2013cv01303
Plaintiff:
Glen Folsom
Defendant:
Mark Knutson, Tracy McCollum, Janet Dowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medinger v. State of Oregon et al
as 1:2012cv02208
Defendant:
Lt. Helling, Lt. Lee and State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Medinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
