Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Hall v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv01787
Plaintiff:
Michael Hall
Defendant:
The City of New York, Captain Fluke and Correction Officer Hyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. The New York City Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv05738
Plaintiff:
Michael Hall
Defendant:
The New York City Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ajaj v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv01455
Plaintiff:
Ahmad M. Ajaj
Defendant:
United States of America, Herman Quay, Paul Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rodland v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2019cv02025
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Rodland
Defendant:
Michael Hall and Nadine Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hall v. Nagara
as 2:2019cv00980
Plaintiff:
John M. Hall and John Michael Hall-Jones
Defendant:
Nagara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Miller et al
as 2:2019cv00067
Defendant:
Larry Rowe, Randal Lee, Daniel Britton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Miller et al
as 3:2019cv00281
Defendant:
Larry Rowe, Randal Lee, Daniel Britton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ali v. Simmons et al
as 3:2019cv10260
Defendant:
Steven L. Simmons, Hickok, Kevin Rockwell and others
Plaintiff:
Fathiree Ali
Hall v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00266
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Hall
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Indiana State Prison, Captain Yantzy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Hall v. Wexford Health Sources, Incorp, et al
as 15-2182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HALL
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INCORPORATED, a corporation and ANDREW TILDEN, Doctor, Medical Director, Pontiac Correctional Center, in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
