Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Somchai Noonsab v. W.T. Brown
as 22-6771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Defendant / Appellee:
DETECTIVE W. BROWN, MELANIE A. SHEKITA, MICHAEL HOWELL and others
Howell v. Henderson et al
as 4:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Michael Howell
Defendant:
Superintendent, Rebecca Henderson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noonsab v. Brown
as 5:2021ct03330
Plaintiff:
Somchai Noonsab
Defendant:
Detective W.T. Brown, Meline A. Shekita, Michael Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. St. Louis County Jail et al
as 4:2021cv00765
Defendant:
Ofc. Unknown Roberson, Ofc. Unknown Mitchell, Lt. Unknown Mohler and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. St. Louis County Jail et al
as 4:2020cv01536
Defendant:
Unknown Porter, Unknown Bracy, St. Louis County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noonsab v. Howell et al
as 5:2019ct03197
Plaintiff:
Somchai Noonsab
Defendant:
Michael Howell and Mr. Siber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noonsab v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
as 5:2016ct03112
Plaintiff:
Somchai Noonsab
Defendant:
United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, W. T. Brown, Stephen Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Howell et al
as 1:2013cv01327
Plaintiff:
Monroe Randle
Defendant:
Michael Howell, Danny Woods, Robbin Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Howell et al
as 1:2012cv02996
Plaintiff:
Monroe Randle
Defendant:
Michael Howell, Steve Vukmer and Unknown Arresting Parole Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell v. Hudson County Prosecutor N.J. et al
as 2:2011cv07196
Plaintiff:
Michael Howell
Defendant:
Hudson County Prosecutor N.J., EDWARD J. DEFAZIO, JERSEY CITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
