Cases 1 - 10 of 194
Wilcox v. Peck et al
as 3:2024cv08115
Plaintiff:
Travis Ray Wilcox
Defendant:
Clayton Peck and Chad Fieple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Celado v. Sorrell et al
as 9:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Jeurin Celado
Defendant:
K. Sorrell, Trim, T. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dove v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Dove
Defendant:
D.O.C.C.S., Daniel F. Martuscello, III, Greene Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Lovell et al
as 5:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Cross, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Lovell, Logan Niles, FNU Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler, Anthony v. County of Eau Claire, WI et al
as 3:2023cv00864
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Butler
Defendant:
The County of Eau Claire, WI, Dave Riewesthal, . Otto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peck v. Rivas et al
as 2:2023cv01870
Plaintiff:
Frank M. Peck
Defendant:
Rivas, Martin, T. Manalang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lakhumna v. Bradbury, et al
as 23-4133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIVEK LAKHUMNA
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN BRADBURY, LIEUTENANT FNU EDDLEMAN, ROBBY KEMPLE, Officer and others
Mongeau v. Peck et al
as 5:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Steven Mongeau
Defendant:
FNU Peck and Kelly Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rozier v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05724
Plaintiff:
Timothy Eugene Rozier
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stacy v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05718
Plaintiff:
Scott Ryan Stacy
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
