Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Odom v. Gregg County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
James Ralph Odom
Defendant:
Gregg County Sheriff's Department, Unknown Grizzle, Unknown Ramo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darren Johnson v. Carter, et al
as 22-1523
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN DEON JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] CARTER, Correctional Officer, MDOC, [UNKNOWN] GROWDY, Correctional Officer, MDOC, [UNKNOWN] OWENS, Lieutenant, MDOC and others
Getzen v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2020cv08053
Plaintiff:
David Getzen
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, Coconino, County of, Unknown Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Erlenbach v. Martin et al
as 3:2019cv08229
Plaintiff:
Chuck C Erlenbach and Treebrook
Defendant:
Travis Blankenship, Blake Lanove, Unknown Hearl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCullers v. Owens
as 6:2018cv00350
Plaintiff:
James Westley McCullers
Defendant:
Unknown Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Wolf v. N. Webb, et al
as 12-40392
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID PAUL WOLF
Defendant - Appellee:
N WEBB, Assistant Warden, UNKNOWN KAZMIERCZAK, UNKNOWN BLACK and others
David Wolf v. N. Webb, et al
as 12-40007
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID PAUL WOLF
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN KAZMIERCZAK, UNKNOWN BLACK and UNKNOWN OWEN
Wolf v. Webb et al
as 6:2011cv00255
Plaintiff:
David Paul Wolf
Defendant:
N Webb, Unknown Kazmierczak, Unknown Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Dorris et al
as 1:2009cv00085
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo Lamont Thomas
Defendant:
Malissa Dorris, Todd Vandergriff, Unknown Reece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2008cv00757
Plaintiff:
Danny Parker
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Unknown Reagan, Unknown Pitts and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
