Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Franklin Davis v. Roanoke Public Defenders
as 23-6242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN W. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROANOKE PUBLIC DEFENDERS, JUDGE DAVID B. CARSON and CHRYSTAL SMITH, Commonwealth's Attorney
Davis v. Davis et al
as 7:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Franklin W. Davis
Defendant:
Crystal Davis and Sheriff Hash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Smith
as 7:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Franklin W. Davis
Defendant:
Crystal Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Roanoke Public Defenders et al
as 7:2022cv00678
Plaintiff:
Franklin W. Davis
Defendant:
Roanoke Public Defenders, Judge Carson and Crystal Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Roanoke City Police Department
as 7:2022cv00679
Plaintiff:
Franklin W. Davis
Defendant:
Roanoke City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Roanoke City Jail
as 7:2022cv00611
Plaintiff:
Franklin W. Davis
Defendant:
Roanoke City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03257
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Burch
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Derek Schmidt, Derenda J. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickens v. Skeen et al
as 6:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Jack Skeen, Jr, Zachary W Davis and Matt Bingham
Plaintiff:
Darren Dickens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ternaprovich et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
James Ternaprovich, Mario Reyes, Ronald T Franz and others
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacey v. Davis et al
as 3:2018cv00589
Defendant:
Judge Wendy W Davis, Alison Yeager, Gregory Ridenour and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance E Lacey, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
