Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Sapp v. Wilfong et al
as 3:2022cv02257
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
Michael B. Wilfong, S.R. Blair, Lexington, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Sapp v. 11th Judicial Circuit Solicitor's Office et al
as 3:2022cv02258
Plaintiff:
Alton Sharan Sapp
Defendant:
11th Judicial Circuit Solicitor's Office, Lexington, County of, South Carolina, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Randall, James v. Wilfong et al
as 3:2020cv00089
Defendant:
Capt. Wirth, H. Stensrud, C/O W. Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
James Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunigan et al v. Purkey et al
as 5:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
Eric Scott Barker
Defendant:
Brian Purkey, Jeff Givens, Vinnie Zummo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunigan v. Purkey et al
as 2:2017cv00040
Plaintiff:
Megan Eileen Dunigan
Defendant:
Brian Purkey, Jeff Givens, Vinnie Zummo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dunigan v. Purkey et al
as 3:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Megan Eileen Dunigan
Defendant:
Brian Purkey, Jeff Givens, Vinnie Zummo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilfong v. West Virginia Department of Corrections, et al.
as 1:2014cv21127
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilfong
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Corrections and McDowell County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilfong v. Van Wilgen et al
as 3:2013cv00466
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wilfong
Defendant:
Stephie Van Wilgen, J. Haddad, J. Savinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goins v. Luster et al
as 4:2012cv01761
Plaintiff:
Donahue Goins
Defendant:
Dale Luster, Howard Kitchell, Michael Rotter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilfong v. Holden et al
as 3:2012cv00992
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wilfong
Defendant:
William Holden, Marc Ramia and Michael Moscowitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
