Cases 111 - 120 of 237
Robert Jr. v. Keefe Commissary
as 1:2018cv02841
Plaintiff:
Paul G. Robert Jr.
Defendant:
Keefe Commissary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tripati v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
Anant Kumar Tripati
Defendant:
Corizon Incorporated, Calvin Johnson, B Anderson Flatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDOZA v. JONES et al
as 4:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, ACCESS CORRECTIONS, TRINITY SERVICES GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller et al v. Annucci et al
as 1:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Mary Miller, Daniel Miller, Eugene Randolph and others
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, James A. O'Gorman, Thomas Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore, Jr. v. Keefe Supply Company et al
as 3:2017cv01386
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Keefe Supply Company, Richard Watson, Austin Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
BARNES v. JONES et al
as 4:2017cv00582
Plaintiff:
OMAR F BARNES
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC and JOHN CLARK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montalvo v. Medical Unit et al
as 2:2017cv00601
Plaintiff:
Misael Montalvo
Defendant:
Medical Unit, John Doe Jetter, John Doe Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander Diya, et al v. Warden Byrnes, et al
as 17-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY ROY MARTIN
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DMOTOMIWA DIYA
Defendant:
MR. WARDEN BYRNES, JOHN D. SWIDER, Grievance Coordinator, TKC HOLDING and others
Withers v. Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company et al
as 2:2017cv03391
Plaintiff:
Michael V Withers
Defendant:
Beecken Petty O'Keefe & Company, Corizon LLC, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keefe v. Montana State et al
as 6:2017cv00092
Plaintiff:
Jordan Keefe
Defendant:
Montana State, Michael Fletcher and Linda Jess
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
