Cases 11 - 20 of 29
OWL FEATHER-GORBEY v. FRAZIER et al
as 2:2017cv01540
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. OWL FEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL FRAZIER, UNKNOWN NAMED REGIONAL DIRECTOR, BALTAZAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ernest Greely, Jr. v. A. Burgess, Jr.
as 16-7028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ernest M. Greely, Jr., also known as Ernest M. Greely-Bey
Defendant - Appellee:
A. Franklin Burgess, Jr., Associate Judge. District of Columbia Superior Court
BURNO v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2015cv01369
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BURNO
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. ONE OR MORE UNKNOWN NAMES U.S. AGENTS et al
as 2:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS, WAHN DICKERSON and LARRY LIPPFORD
Defendant:
ONE OR MORE UNKNOWN NAMES U.S. AGENTS, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, ONE NAMED AUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarborough v. District of Columbia et al
as 5:2012ct03181
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scarborough
Defendant:
District of Columbia, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The GEO Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
NELSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv00715
Plaintiff:
RONNIE NELSON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. AHMED et al
as 1:2011cv02105
Plaintiff:
OMONI JOHNSON
Defendant:
MAQAS AHMED and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DETENTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hudson v. Holder et al
as 4:2010cv00599
Plaintiff:
Harvey J Hudson
Defendant:
Eric Himpton Holder, Jr., District of Columbia, Harley G Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPICER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2010cv01576
Plaintiff:
DEONTE SPICER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHANNON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2010cv00720
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL SHANNON
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and GREER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
