Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Thorson v. USA et al
as 4:2020cv00418
Defendant:
T Todd, FMC Fort Worth, McCabe and others
Plaintiff:
Corey A Thorson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2019cv00010
Defendant:
John Does, Judith Lamare, Dewayne Hendrix and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowart v. Futrell et al
as 2:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
William Shane Cowart
Defendant:
J Futrell, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Qumbargi v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv00137
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Haitham Qumbargi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Piker v. USA et al
as 2:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
James Ray Piker
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons and C V Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, T Outlaw, Nadar Peikar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Davenport et al
as 4:2013cv00412
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Davenport, Charles Samuels, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. FCI - Forrest City et al
as 2:2013cv00068
Defendant:
FCI - Forrest City, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mark A Sheldon and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Does, et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Halke et al
as 2:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
