Cases 11 - 20 of 39
DIRDEN v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00083
Defendant:
FRANK BELL, SCOTT TATUMS, JEFFERY BURNS and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LEE DIRDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES v. CRANE et al
as 1:2020cv02779
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
ROBERT CRANE, ANTHONY LAWRENCE, MADISON COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lang et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mitchell, Charlie Harris, Alexander Jones and others
Defendant:
Wendall Banks, Centurion of Mississippi, LLC, Brenda S. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Shelby County Division Correction et al
as 2:2019cv02278
Defendant:
Thomas Young, Shelby County Division Correction, Reese Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALLACE v. WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2018cv00337
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALLACE
Defendant:
WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BLASINGAME, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Burkes et al
as 3:2018cv00416
Defendant:
Lt. Unknown Jones, Warden Unknown Rice, Captain Unknown Jones and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Gary Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones, Michael v. Syed et al
as 3:2017cv00907
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Defendant:
Syed , Mashak, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Fulton v. Michael Jones, et al
as 17-2474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH FULTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL JONES, Chief and J. SIMS, Det Srgt. #102
Kenneth Fulton v. Michael Jones, et al
as 17-2208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH FULTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL JONES, Chief and J. SIMS, Det Srgt. #102
Jones v. State of North Dakota et al
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Jones
Defendant:
State of North Dakota, R. Benson, Warden Pringle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
