Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Jackson v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv50055
Defendant:
C. Dillabough, John Baldwin, James Martens and others
Plaintiff:
James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton et al v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv50406
Defendant:
C. Dillabough, John Baldwin, James Martens and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall Hampton and James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Jackson et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Peacock
Defendant:
James Jackson, Thomas Kincey, Traves Yelder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery Jackson v. Mark Cieutat, et al
as 17-15406
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY JAMES JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK ALAN CIEUTAT and GUY NAQUIN
Jackson v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv00563
Plaintiff:
James Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dearaujo v. Jackson et al
as 4:2017cv06266
Plaintiff:
Alonso Dearaujo
Defendant:
James Jackson, Luwan Micael and M Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Cieutat et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jeffery James Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Alan Cieutat and Guy Naquin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARSWELL v. CONLEY et al
as 5:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
JAMES JACKSON CARSWELL
Defendant:
T J CONLEY, DONALD BARROW, MICHAEL ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Carswell v. Michael Rogers, et al
as 17-11799
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES JACKSON CARSWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL ROGERS, DOCTOR, Washington State Prison, jointly and severally, individual and official capacity, DWAYNE AYERS, DR. Calhoun State Prison, Jointly and severally, individual and offical capacity, WILLIAM MCCLARIN, JR., DOCTOR Ware State Prison, Jointly and severally, individual and official capacity and others
Ellsworth v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01069
Plaintiff:
James Jackson Ellsworth
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated, Paul Denehy and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
