Cases 21 - 30 of 32
HUDSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
JOHN SCOTT HUDSON
Defendant:
H. SAMPSON and D.P.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Burriola v. Ted D'Amico, et al
as 13-16418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY J. BURRIOLA
Defendant - Appellee:
TED D'AMICO, CRAIG FARWELL, UNKOWN FLORES and others
LeMeur v. Daniels et al
as 5:2009cv05260
Plaintiff:
Marc Edward LeMeur
Defendant:
Charlie Daniels, Dustin McDaniel and John Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillip Lyons v. Patricia Leonhardt, et al
as 09-17294
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP J. LYONS
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA LEONHARDT, JAY BARTH, JAMES COX and others
Charles Manley v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 09-17177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES MANLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRUCE BANNISTER, JOHN SCOTT and others
Trogdon v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2009cv01574
Plaintiff:
Glen Trogdon
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center, (fnu) Rogin, Clark County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womack v. Norris et al
as 5:2009cv00085
Plaintiff:
John Scott Womack
Defendant:
Larry Norris, James Gibson, James Banks and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morrow v. Skolnik et al
as 3:2008cv00274
Plaintiff:
Richard David Morrow
Defendant:
Howard Skolnik, Bruce Bannister and John Scott
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cohen v. Denver County Jail et al
as 1:2008cv00978
Plaintiff:
Solomon Ben-Tov Cohen
Defendant:
Denver County Jail and John Scott
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Manley v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv00374
Plaintiff:
Charles Manley
Defendant:
Nevada Department Of Corrections, Bruce Bannister, John Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
