Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Bismillah v. Bureau of Medical Services et al
as 3:2018cv02741
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, Stuart Hudson, Bureau of Medical Services and others
Plaintiff:
Bismillah and Phillip Douglas Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. John Doe et al
as 3:2018cv01213
Plaintiff:
Eddie Griffin
Defendant:
John Doe, Ottawa County Ohio and Port Clindton Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. John Doe et al
as 1:2018cv01977
Plaintiff:
Eddie Griffin
Defendant:
John Doe, Ottawa County Ohio and Port Clindton Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glenn v. Mohr et al
as 4:2018cv00436
Plaintiff:
Deon S. Glenn
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr and Charmaine Bracy
Interested_party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Harris et al
as 5:2017ct03144
Defendant:
Ruffin Harris, Jr. , James L. Knight , Atkinson Jr. Cleveland and others
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Harris et al
as 7:2017cv00116
Defendant:
Ruffin Harris, Jr., James L. Knight, Atkinson Jr. Cleveland and others
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Harris, Jr. v. OH, et al
as 16-4281
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON HARRIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO and CUYAHOGA COUNTY JAIL
Williams v. Ohio Department of Rehab and Correction, et al. et al
as 3:2016cv00384
Plaintiff:
Melody L Williams
Defendant:
Ohio Dept of Rehab and Corrections, Warden, Dayton Correctional Institution, Jenkins-Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris, Jr. v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2016cv01493
Plaintiff:
Byron Harris, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Ohio and Cuyahoga County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Northern Regional Jail et al
as 5:2016cv00024
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Moore
Defendant:
Northern Regional Jail, Prime Care Medical, Wexford Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
