Cases 21 - 30 of 62
HARDIN v. JONES et al
as 4:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA NEEL HARDIN
Defendant:
JULIA JONES, TRAVIS DONALSON, JOHNATHAN FANFAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Herrera (Collazo) v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2017cv04047
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Herrera (Collazo)
Defendant:
City of New York, Anthony Bozymowski and Timothy Sands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marcos Miranda-Sanchez v. James Sprinkle, et al
as 17-1710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCOS MIRANDA-SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES D. SPRINKLE, Inmate C.I. Suspect, KEITH A. HENDERSON, Prosecuting Attorney Floyd County, DARRELL MILLIS, Sheriff of Floyd County and others
LUCAS v. SANDS et al
as 4:2017cv00062
Defendant:
FRANK LOOP and SANDS
Plaintiff:
KEETH EUGENE LUCAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sands v. Mudano et al
as 3:2016cv01941
Plaintiff:
Kyron M. Sands
Defendant:
Mudano, Iozzia, Gregory Seely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONNER v. SANDS et al
as 4:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE BONNER, SR.
Defendant:
ELLENBRAND, HODDAS, FRANK LOOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONNER v. LOOP et al
as 4:2016cv00126
Defendant:
BADGER, BANIT, DANA BISHON and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY LEE BONNER, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. SANDS et al
as 4:2016cv00068
Defendant:
J. FULMER, FRANK LOOP, NURSE'S DEPT. and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSH v. SANDS et al
as 4:2016cv00035
Defendant:
ELLENBRAND, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL, FURR and others
Plaintiff:
QUAONTUS L. RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Martin et al
as 4:2015cv00734
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams and Antonio Rudley
Defendant:
J Martin, M Briggs, C Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
