Cases 21 - 30 of 50
BANKS v. HATCHER et al
as 4:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Lieutenant TIFFANY PRICE, LETICIA P BELL-BURKS, Lieutenamt JULIE THORNTON and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELO BERNARD BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Ruiz et al
as 3:2018cv01785
Defendant:
Gina, Tawanna, Naqvi and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alkebu-Lan v. Koenig et al
as 3:2018cv06010
Defendant:
Craig Koenig, M. Daguio, Z. Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Shai Alkebu-Lan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CULBREATH v. Reeves et al
as 4:2018cv00038
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE CULBREATH
Defendant:
ROBERT S REEVES, KATHY S PALMER, JOY H CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAILEY v. HATCHER et al
as 4:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant:
SHAY HATCHER, HERRON, CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SEIBERT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JACOB SEIBERT
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY DOZIER, SCOTT CRICKMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. GEORGIA et al
as 4:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
DAVID THEO LEWIS
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SHAY HATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RILEY v. HATCHER et al
as 4:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
DENNIS LEWIS RILEY
Defendant:
SHAY HATCHER, TAMEKA EDGE and DARREN INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BASS v. DUVALL RESIDENTIAL CENTER et al
as 1:2017cv02562
Plaintiff:
SHAY BASS
Defendant:
AMANDA BENSON, DOROTHY, DUVALL RESIDENTIAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Kokinda v. Pennsylvania Department Of Cor, et al
as 17-1960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant - Appellee:
CORREALE STEVENS, Personal Capacity, JAMES J. FITZGERALD, III, Personal Capacity, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
