Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Robert Walden, Jr. v. C/O Lowder
as 11-7288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE WALDEN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O LOWDER, Tillery Unit Officer, C/O EURY, Tillery Unit Officer, T. HILDRETH, Tillery Unit Assistant Unit Manager and others
Frith v. O A S / North Jails et al
as 3:2011cv00187
Plaintiff:
Terdevon Frith, Sr
Defendant:
O A S / North Jails, Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Chad Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TATE v. JONES
as 1:2010cv00616
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDMOND TATE
Defendant:
JONES, SAMI HASAN, JENNIFER LANGLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Wilford et al
as 1:2009cv00517
Plaintiff:
Ricky Crawford
Defendant:
Mr. Wilford, Don Gillgrest, Dr. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillery v. Tran et al
as 6:2009cv00951
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Tillery
Defendant:
Officer Tran and Officer Flounoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. Richwood Correctional Center et al
as 3:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
Jerome A. Polk
Defendant:
Richwood Correctional Center, Allen, Tillery and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Polk v. Richwood Correctional Center et al
as 2:2008cv04969
Plaintiff:
Jerome A. Polk
Defendant:
Richwood Correctional Center, Warden Allen, Warden Tillery and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILLIAMS v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2008cv00542
Plaintiff:
JOHN WALTER WILLIAMS
Defendant:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUPLIN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INST. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tillery v. Tate et al
as 6:2008cv00592
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Tillery
Defendant:
Sgt. Tate, Sgt. Flonnery and Sgt. Keenen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tillery v. Storms
as 6:2007cv00936
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Tillery
Defendant:
L. Storms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
