Cases 21 - 30 of 579
Johnson v. Reynolds, et al
as 23-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
TERESA REYNOLDS, NATALIYA NICKELS, POWELL and others
MOSLEY v. IRWIN et al.
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MOSLEY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY E. MONGELLUZO, DEPUTY M. BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Weaver et al
as 1:2023cv01704
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Winfield Walker
Defendant:
Carter Weaver, Shirley Anderson, Neil Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Dwayne Davis v. Thomas Mackie, et al
as 23-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DWAYNE DAVIS, named as Dwayne Davis El
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN THOMAS P. MACKIE, A. HASKEY, GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR T. BASSETT and others
Weaver v. Chester Mental Health Center
as 3:2023cv00923
Plaintiff:
Patrick V Weaver
Defendant:
Chester Mental Health Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manigo v. Weaver et al
as 1:2023cv00925
Plaintiff:
Tevin J Manigo
Defendant:
Carter Weaver, Shirley Anderson, Brittany Keefner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Grayson v. Johnson et al
as 8:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Evan Lewis Grayson
Defendant:
Neil Johnson, Carter Weaver, Lt. Brittany Keefner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Eckard v. Rhodes et al
as 0:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Seth Eckard, Jr.
Defendant:
Marcus Rhodes, Phillip Thompson, Officer Sapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Pittman v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Pittman
Defendant:
Jeff Long, Roland Jackson, Landee Zanotelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIECO v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MICAHEL ZAKEN, MARK HAMMER, WILLIAM NICHOLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
