Cases 31 - 40 of 175
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022ct03126
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, U.S. District Court Raleigh, NC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2022ct03116
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Shanticia Hawkins, Byron T. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bussie v. Dannels
as 5:2022ct03109
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie
Defendant:
Jennifer Dannels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hall v. Adams et al
as 5:2022ct03099
Plaintiff:
Adam Wade Hall
Defendant:
Anthony A. Adams, Letisha Pruden, Officer Gaskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehurst v. Clark et al
as 5:2022ct03047
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Demetrius A. Clark, Anthony A. Adams, Timothy Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheridan v. Avery Mitchell Correctional
as 1:2021cv00346
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Sheridan
Defendant:
Avery Mitchell Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sheridan v. Avery-Mitchell Correctional Institution
as 5:2021ct03356
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Sheridan
Defendant:
Avery-Mitchell Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Essick v. Simmons et al
as 5:2021ct03318
Petitioner:
Anthony Mark Essik and Anthony Mark Essick
Respondent:
Carlos Simmons, Claude Jarman, S. Stephen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESSICK v. SIMMONS et al
as 1:2021cv00812
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARK ESSICK
Defendant:
LT. CARLOS SIMMONS, CLAUDE JARMAN, S. STEPHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. White et al
as 5:2021ct03313
Plaintiff:
Zane Johnson and Zane Anthony Johnson
Defendant:
David White, Kimberly C. Wynn and George W. Baysden, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
