Cases 31 - 40 of 868
COOPER v. CALIGURI et al
as 2:2024cv00910
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant:
E CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE, DR BASIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee Brown v. Cheryl Eplett, et al
as 24-1248
Plaintiff:
LEE A. BROWN
Defendant:
CHERYL EPLETT, Warden, EMIL TONEY and JOHN/JANE DOE
Galvez v. Nurse et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Jorge I Galvez
Defendant:
Mindi Nurse, . George, . Hamby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Douglas Kidd
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Dr. Lye, Sandra May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winston v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
De'Angelo Don'Virgil Winston
Defendant:
Scott Spurlock, Misty Adkins, Zachery Schelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stauch (ID 129417) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Letecia Stauch
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus, Donna Hook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Klang et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Rodney Klang, Rebecca Tervonen, Sgt Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Jackson v. Catherine Bauman, et al
as 24-1111
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR JACKSON
Defendant:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director, UNKNOWN PARTIES #1, Named as John/Jane Does, Health Unit Manager and others
Smith v. Walstead et al
as 6:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Zechariah Justin Daniel Smith
Defendant:
Carrie Walstead and John/Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Department of Mohr et al
as 2:2023cv01692
Plaintiff:
Jesse J Anderson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Barry Daughtry, Wendy Mohr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
