Cases 31 - 40 of 981
Ramos v. Cheney et al
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Brandon Anthony Ramos
Defendant:
Cheney, Cauley, Scagliarini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daontae Scott v. E. Perez Lugo, et al
as 23-14177
Plaintiff:
DAONTAE T. SCOTT
Defendant:
E. PEREZ LUGO, AUBREY PADGETT, CHRISTINA CREWS and others
Jefferson (ID 44578) v. Moore et al
as 5:2023cv03263
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jefferson
Defendant:
Leonard Moore, Austin Merz, Bryan Buchman and others
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRICIA PRETORIUS, DUSHAW ZATECKY, SARAH SNOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lema v. Perez et al
as 4:2023cv06326
Plaintiff:
Christopher Anthony Lema
Defendant:
R. Perez and K. Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEREZ v. CAMPBELL
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN PEREZ
Defendant:
CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDMOND v. WEXFORD HEALTH et al
as 1:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
JAMARR EDMOND
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH, NOE MARANDET, K. MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin Perez v. Quinton Perrigen
as 23-3248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRVIN PEREZ, also known as IRVIN H. PEREZ, also known as IRVIN PEREZ H.
Defendant / Appellee:
QUINTON PERRIGEN, Correctional Officer
Washington v. Perez Badge no. 3272 et al
as 2:2023cv08623
Plaintiff:
Jerome Washington
Defendant:
C.O. Perez Badge no. 3272, Sheriff Edward Reilly, Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
