Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Turner v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Michael Aaron Turner
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Scott Vail, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. United States of America et al
as 2:2016cv02794
Plaintiff:
Frank Garza Martinez, III
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratliff v. Vailes et al
as 6:2016cv06069
Plaintiff:
William Anson Ratliff
Defendant:
Ashley Vailes, John Felts and Kathy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv01941
Plaintiff:
Rufus Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio and Unknown Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Warner et al
as 3:2015cv05655
Plaintiff:
Michael W Williams
Defendant:
Bernie Warner , Dan J Pacholke , Jean M Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Felt et al
as 4:2015cv04087
Plaintiff:
Melton Lee Miller
Defendant:
John Felt, Sandra Dauzat and Ashley Vail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sellens v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2015cv01300
Plaintiff:
Richard Sellens
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pride v. Vailes et al
as 5:2015cv00126
Plaintiff:
John E Pride
Defendant:
Ashley Vailes, Tashara White, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Courtney Smith v. John Felts, et al
as 15-1530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Courtney Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
John Felts, Chairman, Arkansas Parole Board, Ashley Vailes, Hearing Examiner, Arkansas Parole Board, Rodney Wright, Jr., Parole Officer, Arkansas Parole Office and others
Seyoum Clark v. Chioma Hawkins, et al
as 15-1504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seyoum Ali Clark
Defendant - Appellee:
Chioma Hawkins, Supervising Parole Officer (DCC), Ashley Vailes, Hearing Examiner, Arkansas Parole Board (DCC), Doc Holiday, Pulaski County Sheriff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
