Cases 41 - 50 of 5,814
Gary Carter, Jr. v. Effingham County Sheriff's Department, et al
as 24-10842
Plaintiff:
GARY ANTHONY CARTER, JR.
Defendant:
EFFINGHAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WINSTON MOCK, WELLPATH and others
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., OFFICER SLONG, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Strada et al
as 1:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Benny C. Fields
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Brandon Watwood, Lt. Suanders and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ADAMS v. MEEKS et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TERRY T. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
JERRICHA MEEKS, STOOPY, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2024cv01883
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
JB Pritzker, Latoya Hughes, David Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. VANIHEL
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
GENTLE THOMAS, JR.
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 1:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Clark et al
as 5:2024ct03043
Plaintiff:
John Frank Miller
Defendant:
Ms. Clark, Ms. Lee, Cpt. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dalton v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Jeremy James Dalton
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Fentress County, Shane Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRACKEN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CARLA COAKLEY, M. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
