Cases 41 - 50 of 68
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 11-1560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH W. BOOTH, JACK MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG and others
Debtor - Appellee:
LINCOLN D. WILLIS
Windham v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
Stephen Eugene Windham
Defendant:
Charles Scarborough, Charles Sullivan and Travis Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godwin v. Costello et al
as 1:2011cv00083
Plaintiff:
Seane Godwin
Defendant:
Costello, Scarborough, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenwood v. Epps et al
as 2:2011cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gregory Thomas Greenwood
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv01035
Plaintiff:
Augustus Hebrew Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacchus v. Scarborough et al
as 6:2010cv02857
Plaintiff:
David Bacchus
Defendant:
Lt Scarborough, Lt Richardson, Lt Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Boatwright v. Donald et al
as 1:2010cv00150
Plaintiff:
Mark Otis Boatwright
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Brian Owens, Fred Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Scarborough et al
as 1:2010cv02794
Plaintiff:
Anthony James
Defendant:
Wonda Scarborough, Anthony J Padula and Warden of Lee Correctional Inst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epperson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00738
Plaintiff:
Kevin S. Epperson
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Chaplain Frank Pennell, Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00732
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Thomas L. Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
