Cases 51 - 60 of 260
(PC) Smith v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2020cv00349
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Diaz et al
as 4:2020cv01557
Defendant:
D. Clark, M. Lirones, E. Rollins and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv00636
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County D.O.C.
Plaintiff:
Jose Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chiprez v. Becerra et al
as 4:2020cv00307
Defendant:
B-Yard Sergeants, Heidi Salerno, Herrmann and others
Plaintiff:
Froylan Medina Chiprez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kruppenbacher v. Annuci et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Defendant:
John Doe # 9 Correctional Officer, Thomas R. Griffin, Christopher A. Batista and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kruppenbacher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkley v. Strickland et al
as 5:2019ct03343
Plaintiff:
Dontail Brinkley
Defendant:
Major Strickland, Keith Stone, Corporal Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. MEDINA et al
as 2:2019cv04398
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MEDINA, OFFICER SULLIVAN, OFFICER MOONEY and others
Plaintiff:
MISAEL ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04267
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISON, BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE MEDINA, BERNARD SCOTT and EVERETT KEITH THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04268
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF PRISONS, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE MEDINA, BERNARD SCOTT and EVERETT KEITH THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guts v. County et al
as 4:2019cv00442
Plaintiff:
Richard Wolf Guts
Defendant:
Unknown County, Unknown Duarte, Unknown Shield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
