Cases 51 - 60 of 77
Blaxton v. Robertson et al
as 3:2012cv01359
Plaintiff:
Otis Blaxton
Defendant:
Robertson, Martin, Hanna and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilborn v. Shicker et al
as 1:2012cv09304
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wilborn
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, David Ealey, William Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd Luh v. Corey Farnsworth, et al
as 12-3422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd James Luh
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Mary Attebury, Dr. James Reynolds and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Corey f Farnsworth, Brigette Rose, Tyler Chavez and others
Walker v. Lewis et al
as 3:2012cv00650
Plaintiff:
Demario Dontez Walker
Defendant:
Tyrone Lewis, M. Cotten, M. Ivy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corpus v. Kline et al
as 2:2012cv00073
Plaintiff:
Andrew Corpus
Defendant:
Suzonne Kline, Natasha Johnson, Others Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. Clayton et al
as 3:2011cv03368
Plaintiff:
Justin Fields
Defendant:
James C Clayton, Tarry Williams, Kevin Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. Westcare Foundation Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05078
Plaintiff:
Calvin Burke
Defendant:
Westcare Foundation Inc., Richard E. Steinberg, Shawn Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DICKERSON v. SCHULTZ et al
as 1:2011cv00699
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D. DICKERSON
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AGENT CHRISTOPHER J. MATARELLI, OTHER UNKNOWN STATE POLICE TROOPERS and TROOPER BRAD SCHULTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Munger et al
as 3:2011cv50139
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Lewis
Defendant:
Tanya Munger, Mangrum, Strain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CIENIAWA v. JAMES et al
as 2:2011cv00372
Plaintiff:
JASON CIENIAWA
Defendant:
BARRY JAMES, KERRY VANCE, CHUCK WALTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
