Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Robert Smith v. USA
as 10-1752
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith v. A. et al
as 1:2010cv00384
Plaintiff:
Andrew Robert Smith
Defendant:
Kirke Bartley A., Jr., Howard E. Tanner, Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00216
Plaintiff:
Calvin Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Bruce Pearson, Hattie S. Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 6:2009cv00314
Plaintiff:
Robert . Smith
Defendant:
United States of America and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Joe Brooks v. John Smith, et al
as 09-60543
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE LOUIS BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN ROBERT SMITH, CITY OF MERIDIAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, TERRELL THOMPSON and others
Stewart v. The State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2009cv00412
Plaintiff:
Eric Ste'Phon Stewart
Defendant:
The State of Mississippi, Robert Smith, William LaBarre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Metcalf v. Harris et al
as 2:2009cv00093
Plaintiff:
Riley G Metcalf, Jr
Defendant:
Kent Harris, Bill Hensley, Robert Metcalf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beggs v. Scott et al
as 3:2009cv00263
Plaintiff:
David Beggs
Defendant:
Delano Scott, Melvin Keirston, John Lindeman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brooks v. Smith et al
as 4:2008cv00145
Plaintiff:
Joe Louis Brooks
Defendant:
John Robert Smith, City of Meridian Police Dept., Terrell Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chandler v. Conway
as 1:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dale Chandler, Jr., Robert Smith, Adius Stephens and others
Defendant:
R.L. (Butch) Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
