Cases 61 - 70 of 190
WEHRLI v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00977
Plaintiff:
CATHY WEHRLI
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY , ORLANDO HARPER , CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv00263
Defendant:
ANONYMOUS, B.S.N., ANONYMOUS, D.O.N., ANONYMOUS, M.D. #1 and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prude v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Franklin Prude
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Walter Myers, Sgt. Borders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Crowell v. Michelle Parsons, et al
as 16-1811
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CROWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE L. PARSONS, ARUS, KAREN RHODES, Doctor, HARISH PANDYA, Doctor and others
BRANDT v. JONES
as 3:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
ALLEN JEFFERY BRANDT
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS SECRETARY, J COKER, O MUNTEANU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Crowell v. Michelle Parsons, et al
as 16-1656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CROWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE L. PARSONS, ARUS, KAREN RHODES, Doctor, HARISH PANDYA, Doctor and others
Cameron v. Thomas et al
as 1:2016cv00230
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Cameron
Defendant:
Kim Thomas and Corizon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv02372
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND CLARK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CORIZON INC., JIM KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roosevelt Thomas, Jr. v. Corizon, Inc., et al
as 16-11852
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROOSEVELT THOMAS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, INC., ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TRACY STRICKLAND and others
CROSS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv01487
Plaintiff:
RAMAR CROSS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JIM KENNEY, MICHAEL R. RESNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
