Cases 61 - 70 of 1,915
WILLIAMSON et al v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv03857
Plaintiff:
BOBBY KENNETH WILLIAMSON, ANTONIO BUNDY and NICHOLAS EDWARDS
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, TABB BICKELL, ERIN BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Medical et al
as 3:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Medical, Mental Health, Classification and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Wallace et al
as 3:2023cv03281
Plaintiff:
Dayne Woods
Defendant:
Dax Wallace, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv50348
Plaintiff:
William Malone and Bill
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Tarry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Suwannee C.I. et al
as 3:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Suwannee C.I., Medical Staff, Mental Health Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. All Suwannee TCU Staffs et al
as 3:2023cv01047
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
All Suwannee TCU Staffs, Security, Medical Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Blitch et al
as 3:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
James Elton Roberts
Defendant:
Major Blitch, K. Knight, G. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan Francisco v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN FRANCISCO
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
David Eakle v. Timothy Tibbs
as 23-6854
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID EAKLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY TIBBS, MICHAEL COSTELLO, SHANNON SAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
