Cases 71 - 80 of 137
Valerio v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2012cv00474
Plaintiff:
Jorge Valerio
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2012cv00916
Plaintiff:
MARK S. HUGHES
Defendant:
JANE MAGNUS-STINSON, BARACK OBAMA, JENNIFER A. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Garner v. The Supreme Court of US
as 12-6890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE GARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF BOSTON MA and others
Defendant:
AFFILIATES
Frederick Banks v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, et al
as 12-1858
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Bureau of Indian Affairs, Commissioner and Director, Department of Interior, Secretary, Eric Holder, Department of Justice and others
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 5:2012cv03092
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Valerio v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2012cv00201
Plaintiff:
Jorge Valerio
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarokim v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2012cv00200
Plaintiff:
Jevgini Sarokim
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jo v. Six Unknown Names Agents et al
as 2:2012cv00199
Plaintiff:
Young Yil Jo
Defendant:
Six Unknown Names Agents and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry v. Obama
as 5:2012cv00158
Plaintiff:
Danny William Cherry
Defendant:
Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
