Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Middleton v. Chatham County et al
as 4:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Delano A. Middleton
Defendant:
Chatham County, Chief of Police of Savannah Police Department, Nickolas Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lawrence Brannen v. William Smith
as 22-12268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE ANTHONY BRANNEN
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM L. SMITH, Individual and Official Capacity
Brannen v. Smith
as 1:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Anthony Brannen
Defendant:
William L. Smith and Investigator William L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Colombani, et al
as 3:2021cv00116
Defendant:
Dr. Leslie Colombani, R. Polk, A Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE ESTATE OF ISAAC DEJESUS et al v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05584
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, ANDREA BRANNEN, MCKENZIE NASH and others
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL GARCIA and THE ESTATE OF ISAAC DEJESUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Lopez et al
as 4:2017cv00175
Defendant:
Steve Lopez, Robert Lanius, Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Brannen Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Jones et al
as 3:2016cv01015
Plaintiff:
Raymond Perry
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Kevin D. Jordan, J. H. Yonn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ash v. Landrum et al
as 3:2015cv01536
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Ash
Defendant:
Christopher Landrum, Jeffrey Brannen, J L Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTLAND v. WILLIAMSON et al
as 7:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL TIMOTHY RUTLAND
Defendant:
CASEY D WILLIAMSON, ROBERT BRANNEN, FLOYD COSPELICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTLAND v. COSPELICH et al
as 7:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL TIMOTHY RUTLAND
Defendant:
FLOYD COSPELICH, ROBERT BRANNEN, CASEY D WILLIAMSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
