Cases 1 - 10 of 11
ADAMS v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2023cv02142
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SUPERINTENDENT METELLUS, KELLY REED and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. ARMARK FOOD SERVICES et al
as 1:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
ARMARK FOOD SERVICES, FRANK VANIHEL, CHRIS HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. HENDRIX et al
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL L. WALKER
Defendant:
JAY HENDRIX, C. HOLCOMB, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, CORRECTION OFFICER B. BUTLER, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jack Williams v. Jeff Woods, et al
as 16-2589
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFF WOODS, C. HORTON, Deputy Warden, D. ISARD, Deputy Warden and others
Greene #251997 v. Miller et al
as 2:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene #251997
Defendant:
R. Miller and B. Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #175232 v. Woods et al
as 2:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Jack Williams #175232
Defendant:
Jeff Woods, C. Horton, D. Isard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUTLER v. FLENORY et al
as 5:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
WILLIE B BUTLER
Defendant:
BRANDON FLENORY, DON BLAKELY, JAMES HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Toombs et al
as 5:2012cv00063
Plaintiff:
Tony B. Butler
Defendant:
Jimmy Toombs, Brown Sebreskan Daaim and Courtney Gaines Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Toombs et al
as 5:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
Tony B. Butler
Defendant:
Jimmy Toombs, Brown Sebreskan Daaim and Gaines Countney Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
