Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Kevin Coit v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-2322
Defendant:
SGT HUNT, State Trooper, LT DIEHL, SUPERINTENDENT KLINEFIELDER and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
TIPTON v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Defendant:
MICHAEL MCCOY, J. DIEHL, SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Plaintiff:
SKY TIPTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COIT v. CLOSE et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CLOSE, PA DOC, SECRETARY LAUREL HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Dwight Bowen v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT BOWEN
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DORINA VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
Clark v. Barrow County Jail
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Steven Clark
Defendant:
Barrow County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flakes v. Reed et al
as 2:2024cv10475
Plaintiff:
Jason Flakes
Defendant:
Reed, D. Horvath, J Bugbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flakes #407798 v. Reed et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jason Flakes #407798
Defendant:
Unknown Reed, D. Horvath, J. Bugbee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR. and CHRISTOPHER JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL R. HARRY, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Maloney et al
as 2:2023cv02243
Plaintiff:
Lerin Hughes
Defendant:
. Maloney, . Renfro, . Geotz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maclin-Carney v. Maloney et al
as 2:2023cv02229
Plaintiff:
Ademeko Maclin-Carney
Defendant:
Corey Maloney, . Renfro, Macon County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
